Critical Analysis Of Young Goodman Brown :: Free Essay Writer

Critical Analysis of fresh Goodman chocolate-brownNathaniel Hawthorne&8217s short story of Young Goodman Brown is a reflection of the puritan faith as well as man&8217s competitiveness between good and wretched. This analysis will underscore on the pedestal of Young Goodman Brown as well Hawthorne&8217s usage of symbolic representation and allegories throughout the story.literary critic D.M. McKeithan says that the theme of the story is sin and the arch effect sin has on mankind. McKeithan also believes that the theme to Hawthorne&8217s Young Goodman Brown, is based on the ability that evil has to persuade man to do wrong and the glumness of man&8217s virtues. The protagonist in the story, Brown, journeyed in the woods where he discovered that his Puritan community is not virtuous. Brown discovered that the entire community including his wife, whom is portrayed as being pure, indulges in sin and therefore Brown&8217s life turns dark repayable to his loss of hope. Literar y critic Mark Van Doren states&8220Young Goodman Brown mode exactly what it says, namely that its hero left his pretty young wife one howevering &8230 to walk by himself in a prime New England woods, the Devil&8217s territory,&8230and either to dream or actually to experience (Hawthorne will not say) the discovery that evil exist in either human heart&8230Brown is changed. He thinks there is no good on earth&8230Brown, waking from his dream, if it was a dream,&8230sees evil even where it is not&8230He had stumbled upon that &8220mystery of sin which, rightly understood, provides the only sane and beamish view of life there is. Understand in Brown&8217s fashion, if darkens and sours the world, withering hope and charity, and perverting whatever is truly good until it looks like evil at its worst like blasphemy and hypocrisy. (Van Doren 234)McKeithan says that Hawthorne is saying that in every human heart there is sin, but the story does not emphasize on sin alone, it emphasizes on the effects of sin. McKeithan states that to interpret Young Goodman Brown, the lecturer must make the distinction between sin and the effects of sin.Literary critic David Levin says that Brown allows the Devil&8217s statements about the persecution of Indians and the Quakers allows him to accept the false statements of the Devil. Therefore Brown fails to distinguish the difference between a mavin person and actions of people as a whole. Levin says that Hawthorne&8217s way of written material Young Goodman Brown gives a clear interpretation of the meaning.