Gavin Menzies’ Voyages

Gavin Menzies Essay Gavin Menzies was a royal navy submarine sandwich captain that worked for the British government and now is trying to let the knowledge base know his opinion on the discovery of the Americas did the Chinese discover the Americas in advance Columbus? Menzies takes on a voyage where he tries to find yard to support his thesis and comes up with several antithetic theories his first polish off Calicut. Menzies claims that the Ming dynastys famous navigator Zheng He managed to reach the cape of good apprehend and from there he should contribute reached the Americas too.Gavin as well claims that a famous Italian writer of the time, Nicolo Di Conti, qualification have made contact with Zheng s pass on in Calicut and cleverness have also left with them for the New beingness Unfortunately for Menzies this idea was quickly discarded for there are historical demonstrates that suggest that Di Conti immediately returned back to Italy after his trip to Calicut ( he might have also carried most Chinese maps of their voyages with him).Menzies then pulls out some more evidence that a map found was possibly a Chinese map that led to the islands of the Antilles, alone according to a a couple of(prenominal) historiographers and cartographers, the maps were confusing away and the islands were displaced in random places. The possibility of a shipway on one of the tropical islands was rejected by many geologists that republic that those rocks where there for no peculiar reason.Still not giving up on his quest, Gavin Menzies slightly alters his theory he affirms that an Italian, Verazzano, went on a voyage with the Chinese and stating that he saw people running like Chinese but as we already know, even Columbus, ruling that the people he thought were Chinese but they were just the Native American tribes that lived on the coastline.It was also verified that Indigenous people were descendants of different Asian tribes that might have reached t he Americas by crossing an icy passage in newton America. There is no concrete information or evidence that the Chinese ever got to America, because if that were so than the Chinese would have set up outposts, settled or maybe started trading the tropical goods with Europe and probably could have made a fortuneLastly, Menzies tries convincing the people when he claims that an onetime(a) Chinese report states that the Ming fleet arrived at the shore of about 3000 different countries(the only way to do this was by reaching the Americas too) The Chinese historian that owned the archives rejects this last of Gavins theories because of a simple calligraphy see the Chinese character means 30 and means 3000 so the record can be misunderstood because the record actually just meant 30 different countriesAny claims concerning history, especially when it has been firmly accepted by historians and other professionals on that certain topic, should have reliable and plausible evidence alo ng with clarifications and explanations to be supported That is how history has been built up so off the beaten track(predicate) and its how it will continue to be built. When an personal line of credit concerning history that relies on inaccurate evidence and unsupported theories, such as that found in Menzies show. The argument does not deserve to be reconsidered.