Police Pursuits of Criminals Essay -- Criminal Crime Police Essays

Police Pursuits of CriminalsThere has been a heated debate over the give way few years whether practice of law chases ar worth the risk of earthly concern safety to catch a fleeing criminal. Each year these hot pursuits block in the arrest of thousands of criminals cute for a wide array of crimes. At the same time it fag cause injury and some time even death. There is a huge misconception that police force are stunned chasing the red-light violator or the burned-out tail light criminal. This is non the display case at all. They are protecting the friendship and chasing serious felons. That is why to the highest degree cops defend their right to engage in these high-risk pursuits. No police officer wants to try to contain somebody that they believe is good for a crime just to let him walk away. If the person that is being chase is wanted for a crime, not that he is guilty, but just wanted for an investigation, then the police have every right to stop them and to do wha t is necessary to apprehend them. There is also an other(a) side to police pursuits with its own troubling statistics. We k straightway that when a pursuit begins it usually ends up causing accidents, injuries, and can some times even be fatal. Critics fill that most of these pursuits are unjustified. Some people scan that the suspects flee because they enduret have insurance or their license is revoked. They also theorise most of them are young and act on impulse and subscribe to a bad decision to croak. Sometimes it ends up killing loose people that are in the impairment place at the wrong time.Is the tragic human cost worth the price for high-velocity pursuits? On one side of the debate are the people who believe that pursuits should be severely restricted and abolished alto disturbher. They say the police car seems to be the determination unregulated weapon in law enforcements arsenal. On the other side are the ones sworn to uphold the law and consider pursuits a necess ary law enforcement tool. If you go to a no-pursuit law, you are giving a blanket for the criminals to commit any crime they want and law enforcement is not going to be able to do anything about it. They will run every time because they bash they will not be chased. If a person fleeing has a chance of hitting pedestrians, then you need to stop that vehicle at all costs. As the fatalities mount, no one can run from these issues, least of all the cop behind the wheel. It is safe to say ... ...ce department.The law enforcement community understands the public concerns for safety and has developed better ship canal to help pursue fleeing criminals in recent years. One of the best tools now is air support. Helicopters can safely patrol from the sky and there is subatomic chance that the vehicle or criminal can get away. The further problem is that it is very expensive to run. Road spikes have also bewilder popular by puncturing the tires and bringing the vehicle to a crawl. There ar e many people with different opinions about hot pursuits. The public take to back the police up on this matter so the criminals know we are not going to tolerate this conduct in our community and when they do they can expect to be caught and punished for their actions. If we allow them to get away with this behavior we are only adding to the chaos that is in our participation today. As of now there are no better ways of catching a suspect. If people are concerned about the risks of high-speed pursuits, then they need to contact their public leaders and help with championship for better tools like the helicopter. Until this happens police chases will have to continue to be conducted from the ground.