Thomas Malthus Thomas Jefferson Essay Example for Free

doubting Thomas Malthus Thomas Jefferson EssayThomas Malthus is popular for his Malthusian theory of world where he presents a mathematical perspective to express his governmental theory about population. To him, the population grows at a geometric rate while the food cut grows at an arithmetic progression and the resultant effect of this is that the population would out do the food supply. Consequently there would be change magnitude rates of starvation and extreme poverty.Although he was aware of technological advancement he did not appreciate the fact that it would have a significant effect on the food toil and hence the adverse do of population growth would not be felt. He argues that the population would be checked by ingrained calamities like drought, war, famine as well as moral bulwark where some large number may not get married or others would delay marriage to render few children. He overly cited high infant mortality rates as a substance of controlling t he population.Although many dismissed his theory citing it as one full of pessimism, Thomas Jefferson partly support it. To him, it would best explain the atomic number 63an situation but not the American state. It is actually true the American land was very vast that it would accommodate many people. Population growth would consequently be seen as a means of ensuring that the unoccupied lands were utilized. (Faragher J, 2002). If the Americans worked hard to increase labor effectiveness then the food supply would be adequate for the increasing population. He argued that both the food supply and the population would increase at a geometric progression and hence no cause for alarm.Thomas Jefferson did not look to estimate industrialisation and advocated for change magnitude agriculture. He distinguished Europe and America where he was quick to note that Europe had abundant labor and if it utilized its land to the optimal it would be able to overcome the adverse effects of populati on growth. (Wood J, 1994). To him, Europe should aim at maximizing its labor potential. He further argued that the European political economy was in a manner that needed to be changed as it was exploitative and to this respect he favored the democratic American population.Population policies did not exist to control the population but natural means favored it. It is important to note that immigrants were excluded but this was not repayable to economic reasons but due to racial as well as religious reasons. (Wood J, 1994). He explained how the European population had doub lead in a span of 23-24 years which is equivalent to a 3% increase per annum making it necessary to reserve the previous reserves as they would be needed by the increasing population. However, for the American case he argues that population growth would be a mechanism of ensuring that vacant lands were occupied. (Wood J, 1994).I think that both Malthus and Jefferson had a misconception regarding population growth and food supply. They underrated peoples innovation abilities. The theory was ground on historic data and consequently a way of explaining historical trends and hence ineffective in explaining future population trends. It is inappropriate to justify the applicability of the theory because Europe population seemed to be increasing in a regular pattern. The linear or rather arithmetic progression of food supply was not based on experimentation but rather on convenient assumptions. (West B and Deering W, 1995).Population does not seem to increase exponentially as they both argued. In fact in the face of industrialization people tend to concentrate more in improving the quality of life rather than the population size. Again, the thought that population growth and food supply being independent on each other is also wrong. Malthusian theory does not bear any truth in todays auberge as peoples birth rates have declined.A major advantage of increased physical mobility in the American soc iety is that it ensured the provision of labor in areas where it is demanded and this was vital in the industrialization process. The physical mobility is also vital as it ensures the transfer of technological know how which is very significant in economic growth.(Bergsten F, 2005). Social evils like crime and prostitution are bound to rise due to increased mobility. The political organization must also be affected as with time some immigrants frame permanent citizens and have to air their views which is not necessarily the wish of the natives. Discrimination also emerged especially against the immigrants and this led to the rise of classes. The immigrants recorded lower living standards as compared to the natives. (Bergsten F, 2005).ReferencesJohn MacK Faragher 2002. Out of Many A History of the American People, 4th ed. Prentice Hall Publisher.Fred Bergsten. 2005. The United States and the World Economy Foreign economical Policy for the immigrants. Peterson Institute Publishers.B ruce West and William Deering. 1995. The Lure of Modern accomplishment Fractal ThinkingWorld Scientific Science Publishers.John Cunningham Wood. 1994. Thomas Robert Malthus Critical Assessments.Routledge Publishers.